Since a comprehensive genetic genealogy project on Scots-Irish families has already been underway for many years now, I will simply quote some of the findings and explain what we now know about the genetic composition of the Scots-Irish. It is true that many were; it is also true that many families that were Scots-Irish have other origins.
These two areas in the Highlands were influenced by the reformed church movement in Scotland at an early date and also had migration to the north of Ireland beginning in the s and continuing into the s. Other families also became Scots-Irish. In east Donegal and in the Bann valley area, there were many native Irish families that converted to the reformed church and later the Presbyterian faith, and also were part of the Ulster migration to the New World in the s. There were also a number of Welsh and English families that were living in Ireland and participated in the Ulster Migration and that became part of the Scots-Irish society in the Colonies.
While most Scots-Irish came from the nine counties that make up the province of Ulster in the north of Ireland, some Scots-Irish came from other parts of Ireland. By the s there were families of Scottish origin living in many parts of Ireland and some Scots-Irish have ancestors that migrated to the Colonies from Mayo, Sligo, Dublin, Cork, etc. About half, or just under half, of the Scots-Irish were of Lowland ancestry. The remaining were a mix of those of English and Huguenot ancestry, and, to an even lesser extent, Palatine. What initially united this group was their faith — they were all Protestant dissenters, mostly of the Presbyterian faith, and certainly Calvinist in their theology — and their place in Ulster before the migration.
That brings us to migration history. Around , Irish Protestants, largely from Ulster, migrated to the colonies in the 18th Century in three big waves, starting about the year and continuing to the period just before the American Revolution.
Review essay of Born Fighting: How the Scots-Irish Shaped America | Michael S Newton - keestaikrypda.tk
Ulster dissenters that came to the colonies in the 18th Century were universally rejected by the Anglo-Saxon landed class who had already settled the land on the eastern coastline, which forced most of them to settle in what was then the western fringes of British America. I wanted to talk about the hybrid culture they shared which, contrary to Webb again, was more Northern Irish than Lowland Scottish , but I am tired of typing for now.
It is the combination of origins, migration history, and historical experiences that make the Scots-Irish. They were not the only Protestant dissenters in this country at the time. But they were dissenters from Ulster who migrated here in the 18th Century and played a notable role on the frontier, in the Revolution, and during the westward expansion of the early 19th Century.
There is a balanced way to honor our ancestors without going overboard.
The Fighting Scots-Irish
The Huguenot Historical Society seems to have the proper formula. Reblogged this on Damage inc.
- Revenge of the Spellmans: A Novel.
- Where have all the Scots Irish gone? Numbers way down?
- [Born Fighting: How the Scots-Irish Shaped America] | keestaikrypda.tk.
- Boekblok Cliënt & medezeggenschap in de zorg;
- Our Frequent Buyer Card!
Site Admin April 30, The number of Scots that migrated to Ireland was tiny compared to the over population of the one area they settled in — Ulster. Also the Scotch and Irish never mingled either, staying so separate that there was not an mix of genes. The Languages also stayed separate, the few Scotch in Ireland never learned Gaelic. The Scots that moved to Ireland moved because of the lure of very very cheap land — NOT religious or political persecution.
Keith Bruce December 16, The Historic Present. Truth v. Like this: Like Loading Leave a Reply Cancel reply Enter your comment here Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:. Email required Address never made public. Name required. In his first work of nonfiction, bestselling novelist James Webb tells the epic story of the Scots-Irish, a people whose lives and worldview were dictated by resistance, conflict, and struggle, and who, in turn, profoundly influenced the social, political, and cultural landscape of America from its beginnings through the present day.
Their cultural identity reflected acute individualism, dislike of aristocracy and a military tradition, and, over time, the Scots-Irish defined the attitudes and values of the military, of working class America, and even of the peculiarly populist form of American democracy itself. Through engrossing chronicles of the challenges the Scots-Irish faced, Webb vividly portrays how they developed the qualities that helped settle the American frontier and define the American character.
Grant, Audie Murphy, and George S. Paperback , Expanded Edition , pages. Published October 11th by Broadway Books first published More Details Original Title.
Data Protection Choices
Other Editions Friend Reviews. To see what your friends thought of this book, please sign up. To ask other readers questions about Born Fighting , please sign up. Lists with This Book. Community Reviews. Showing Rating details. More filters.
Sort order. Apr 07, Carol Storm rated it did not like it Shelves: stay-away-joe , made-me-throw-up , right-wing-douche-bag. Dreadful history -- dishonest on every level!
MORE BY JAMES WEBB
I know that James Webb was a fighting Marine in Vietnam. I honor his service. But I still think this book is dishonest,distorted, and offensive on every level. Time and again as I was reading it I just wanted to throw it against a wall. Whatever his skills as a fighting man, Webb is a limited intellect with no sense of history and no capacity for self-perception. As a result, his book is so biased, selective and dishonest it boggles the mind. It's grea Dreadful history -- dishonest on every level!
It's great that he traces the roots of the Scotch Irish all the way back to Gaelic tribes who fought against the Romans. He brags that the Celts in Scotland "never submitted to Rome" and "would lie submerged in swamp water for days rather than submit to Roman slavery. Or to the Vietcong. Evidently Webb only recognizes tyranny when the victims look just like him.
My heart bleeds, it really does. But at least Edward didn't sell the Scots into slavery and force them to pick cotton for years. And he didn't drop napalm on their cities either. Was Edward I really any worse than Andrew Jackson? And were the Scots who fought Edward really any more heroic than the Seminoles who fought Andrew Jackson?
- The Unwritten #19, Jan 2011.
- Bioastronomy — The Next Steps: Proceedings of the 99th Colloquium of the International Astronomical Union held in Balaton, Hungary, June 22-27, 1987.
- A Fourier Analysis And Its Applications;
These are the kind of questions Webb is either too dumb to ask or too dishonest to answer. It's very painful to hear Webb go on and on about Andrew Jackson's courage and love of liberty -- as if black slavery was somehow not "important" enough to count as a real crime against liberty.
How come when Edward I massacres the Scots he's an evil tyrant, but when Jackson massacres the Indians he's a great American? Again, Webb is either too dumb to see the comparison or too dishonest to think it through. This book really left me feeling disgusted with American history, and with James Webb. View all 18 comments. This is a self-aggrandizing, myopic view of Webb's people, with an entrenched narrative of long-suffering while making excuses for anything negative. While I grant that there is a lot of truth contained in this book, and Webb does present a fair amount of the complexities of the history, he persistently casts everything in the light of how great the Scots-Irish are, and how they have been unfairly maligned by the "liberal elite" and those damn educated people.
So while he talks on one side about This is a self-aggrandizing, myopic view of Webb's people, with an entrenched narrative of long-suffering while making excuses for anything negative.